Posted by
Marshall's Law on Tuesday, September 07, 2010 4:51:48 PM
Entry # 188
Marshall’s Law Townhall Dateline – What should be common sense research study reveals losing November 2010 elections to Democrats is not option for American conservative Judeo-Christian patriots. Following “outline” reveals neutral political power options for both sides, good and evil Marxist-fascist Liberal Democrats and Moderate Republicans.
Reader doubts threats to Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process republic need only answer these questions.
1. How many American private sector industries has America last crowd nationalized in last five years? (reader’s homework assignment develop list)
2. How many private sector asset re-distribution policies has America last crowd enacted on Americans in last five years? (reader’s continued assignment develop list)
3. How many fascist public sector regulations has America last crowd forced on Americans in last five years? (reader’s continued assignment develop list)
4. How many national security plus domestic tranquility threats have America last crowd dumped on America in last five years? (reader’s continued assignment develop list)
Many more questions with answers that identify America last crowd are possible. Reader’s assignment, for bonus points create questions with answers that re-affirm that Marxist-fascist Liberal Democrats and Moderate Republicans are closet leaders of America last crowd. Why, identify those for whom losing is not an option to American conservative Judeo-Christian patriots.
I. Different sides in America’ impending political power conflict to save America’s ethical capitalist constitutional republic: To quote Thomas Jefferson, “enemies in war, friends in peace”.
II. Players in America’s impending political power conflict:
Identifying players starts with understanding definition of disciple, one who accepts and assists in spreading doctrine of another.
- Intellectuals only (educators and some talk show hosts)
- Advocates (purists and charlatans)
- Warriors:
1. Patriots: soldiers, scouts, spies, ambassadors, envoys (to recruit shadow allies and keep some out of conflict)
2. Fee lance not free lance: soldiers, scouts, spies, ambassadors, envoys (to recruit shadow allies and keep some out of conflict)
- Sympathizers
- Collaborators
- Infiltrators (traitors and spies different – this is outline explained another time)
- Apathetic (do not care who takes care of them)
- Pilgrims (believe can always make deals with evil people like Chamberlain and Hitler, or Moderate Republicans like Chamberlain McCain trusting deals with Marxist–fascist Liberal Democrats)
- Centralists / moderates who stand for nothing but doing what ever it takes to “just get along”
III. Strategies: non-violent; violent; non-participation
IV. Rules of Engagement: might may or not make right, but always determines ending. In some conflicts only rules are rules of survival. Sometimes Marshall’s social power formula can help determine option when formula is used to compare both sides. Marshall’s formula: social power = (equals) Q1 (quality) + (plus) Q2 (quantity) over timing.
V. Tactics:
Excerpt SPY AS Verb: Art and Ethics of Surveillance class room training tool used by Texas Drifter
Recall, exploited mistakes or poor timing cause defeats, not strengths. Patience is crucial for there are no second chances in politics. Chances are, if they’re not looking for you, they won’t find you. Another technique of good security is being long gone before the bad guys arrive or show up.
There are three types of political tactics:
I) Nonviolent - voting for most or least qualified candidate, seeking office through election or appointment, lobbying, trades, demonstrations, strikes, civil disobedience, bribery, blackmail, coup d’etat and other methods.
II) Violent - sabotage (selective or general); defensive execution (different than assassination); war (conventional, nuclear, biological, or chemical); coup d’etat; and other methods.
Note: terrorism is not included as a viable tactic since the goal of viable tactics is potential accomplishment of intended results.
However, an “ambush” is the use of violence against players or collaborators. The ambush which is better known as a surprise attack can be a viable hit and run tactic. Historically terrorism has never achieved success against professionals, and should never be considered a viable tactic.
Terrorism can be defined as the threat of or use of non-offensive violence against civilians, bystanders, or the non-involved. There are two types terrorism: private sector and public sector (domestic and foreign).
The goal of public sector terrorism is manipulation of majority or minority portions of the population. Public sector motives for terrorism include: 1) greed for taxpayer dollars for career advancements; 2) lust for power to control citizens by reducing or eliminating constitutional rights; or revenge which makes examples of citizens wanting freedom or justice. Some examples of public sector terrorism include: Sherman’s March through Georgia, Wounded Knee, Waco Massacre, countless on site executions, and numerous malicious corrupt prosecutions.
ICMs (investigation company managers) should never forget that the odds are fifty-fifty that any domestic terrorism could have been carried out by public sector bureaucrats pretending to be dissidents.
Two motives for civil servants to frame the bad guys include: 1) additional justification to pass legislation which gives government more power at the expense of constitutional liberties and 2) more power translates into better job benefits and more career advancement opportunities for public sector bureaucrats.
When it comes to domestic terrorism, domestic governments clearly have the motives; the resources; the opportunities; the mentality; and most important of all, access to the criminal justice system which facilitates framing likely suspects.
III) Non participation - different than apathy; this tactic was first formalized by the Radical Civil Union in Argentina during the latter part of the nineteenth century. Nonparticipation may be resorted to when peaceful tactics do not achieve partial success and conditions do not warrant the use of violence.
This approach may also be used to provide the citizen time to acquire appropriate or additional resources for alternate responses. A key factor in nonparticipation or partial nonparticipation is mass education. The community should be aware that the group which has chosen not to support “the lesser of two evils” is still politically conscious. In some scenarios, voters are accomplices to tyranny or mob rule.
This tactic allows the system sufficient time to stagnate from oppression Or mismanagement; while providing the activist with more material for propaganda. The Radical Civic Union failed to achieve their long term goals even though their nonparticipation tactic served its purpose. By failing to remain publicly politically active, the Radical Civic Union was not in a position to capitalize on initial success.
Nonparticipation extends beyond not voting and does not include being politically dormant. This tactic includes not working for or volunteering to help the offending political system. At the same time, the citizen should maintain political skills by working only for private nonprofit type organizations.
Socialist governments dilute the impact of their corruption and incompetence by recruiting private citizens to provide volunteer services for public sector service programs. These citizen volunteers are subsidizing their own tyranny. Governments may be able to force citizens to pay taxes, but they cannot force citizens to be volunteers or employees. Excluding matters of national security, and support for the armed forces; patriotic citizens should not lend their support or loan their services to corrupt or incompetent governments.
This tactic offers results with minimum costs and eliminates the need for marches, demonstrations, protests, or violence. An old friend said it best: anything for country, not a damn thing for socialist governments.
As political power is neither created nor destroyed, rather collected or dispersed the regenerative progression concept suggests that the future states could appear as “internationalist regional committees.”
VI. Tactics and Strategies can be blended. Examples:
1. One Deciding battle – San Jacinto, Texas War for Independence
2. Attrition Battles:
- Buy time: Alamo
- Hit and run
- Sabotage
- Break population’s spirit: Sherman’s March through Georgia, fire bombing Germany also destroyed war making sources, atom bomb Japan also saved one hundred thousand American lives from not having to invade Japan and surrounding islands
- Napoleon’s divide and conquer; and
- Marshall’s “up close and personal” variation of Napoleon’s strategy
“Marshall’s Triangle”: right social power formula; right strategy; right tactic or weapons system can be discussed in another writing exercise.
VII. Social Power Conflict Etiquette: One does not have to like, respect, or socialize with their allies during social power conflicts; only tolerate them for common goal of victory.
Examples; greatest personality defects of some conservative celebrity radio talk show hosts is not greed, rather their vanity which is not only a spiritual sin; but can also guarantee defeat. One might describe the clique like almost cult like snob attitudes of some conservative colleges, institutions, and celebrities as being conservative movement’s version of Hollywood leftist liberal elite.
Generally Texas Drifter would have no trouble naming these conservative spoiled brats, but problem is conservatives have a pending war to win and need all resources we can muster. Warning for these conservative intellectual aristocrats; lay off Reagan Democrats as the worst Reagan Democrat is a better example of American traditions than any of you vanity driven charlatan conservatives. You who spend too much time reading your own press releases may rate your vanity higher than victory for America, but many patriots have differing ideas.
Reader can recall animosity between Houston, Travis, and Bowie of Texas Independence fame. Travis and Bowie despised each other so much they decided to settle their differences in a duel to the death after Texas had won its Independence from Mexico. Unfortunately Travis and Bowie died fighting side by side at the Alamo and never lived to settle their differences in duel to death over honor.
Their example should serve all conservatives, reason no two conservatives will probably never agree on everything is because they are conservatives. So conservatives for good of your children’s and grand children’s constitutional republic; stop acting like female dogs at least until America has been saved from Marxist-fascist Liberal Democrats and Moderate Republicans.
As Far as Moderate Republicans pretending to be helpful conservatives, exploit their help; but never let them behind you with a dagger. What was it that former Republican President used to say, trust but verify? Following a question with another question, Do Saudi’s clandestine support for Islamic fascist terrorist attacks continue because they know “Moderate Republicans are their “best aristocrat friends”? Just asking a question many other Americans would like to know answer too.
For the reader who suggests that some of listed options might be too harsh. Reference Entry # 121 “Texas Drifter Self Defense Not A Sin?”
Texas Drifter truths: life is not fair, when good people for what ever reason or excuse trade vigilance for moral convenience; rules of social power politics become equal for both sides, good and evil; hence losing 2010 November elections to Marxist-fascist Liberal Democrats is non-option for conservative Judeo-Christian patriots.
Doubt this Texas Drifter empirical future history observation; let Marxist-fascist Liberal Democrats be re-elected or more likely steal November 2010 elections; or worse yet do everything they can to “burn to the ground” all of America’s traditions, values, principles, ethical capitalist economic system, due process constitutional republic before January 2011.
That is Texas Drifter orphan some money to conservative Judeo-Christian patriots; and Mr. Texas Drifter to Marxist-fascist Liberal Democrats and Moderate Republicans.