Entry # 299

 

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Why are discriminations based on majority racism and ethnic prejudices  unacceptable, when minority racism and ethnic prejudices are socially acceptable?

 

There are three types of racism and ethnic prejudices: 1) private sector, 2) public sector, and 3) mixed sectors which describe private-public sectors racism and ethnic prejudices. Seems hypocritical for public sector racists and ethnic haters to chastise private sector racists and ethnic haters; theme for another writing exercise.

 

One example of public sector tolerated racial and ethnic hatred involves discrimination by tax exempt status which allows non-profit organizations to promote and discriminate under the “letter of the law”.

 

Contemporary example of mixed racial and ethnic discrimination involves following private and public sector members in one South Texas Community: business men, medical professionals, one hospital, some community leaders, area public sector educators, at least one FCC regulated AM radio station whom are all operating their one project under federal tax exempt tax status to provide education scholarships to essentially one minority group which is really member of majority ethnic group.

 

This same South Texas community is good example of how mixed sector racist and ethnic hatred policies can evolve into other race based or ethnic based discrimination policies:
1. Hurricane Dolly when and where one county public sector emergency rescue services were limited to Mexican American rural families and were denied to Western European heritage rural families.
2. Indigent health care services limited to “poor” Mexican American families and were and are denied to Western European heritage “poor” families.
3. Social services like food stamps discrimination preferences provided to “poor” Mexican American families and illegal immigrants while being denied to Western European heritage “poor” family citizens.
4. FCC licensed radio station takes money from self appointed celebrity who refers to station’s most popular conservative talk show hosts Limbaugh, Hannity, and Levin plus President Lincoln as fascists. Wonder if the same station would take money to allow some individual to describe popular Hispanic respected leaders in same community as fascists?

 

Above item four is not about limiting free speech entitled by Bill of Rights. Seems only fair that if FCC can encourage publicly licensed radio stations to run affirmative action disclaimers that white males need not apply for employment; the FCC might also encourage publicly licensed stations to run disclaimers that it broadcasts racially offensive ethnic hatred material against conservative Americans?

 

Closing thought, if it is “American” for private sector minorities and public sector bureaucrats to engage in racist and ethnic based discriminations and preferences by providing tax benefits to non-profit organizations.

 

Then why should these minority and ethnic hating citizens with help of public bureaucrats, complain if some citizens of Western European heritage start a non-profit organization with a tax exempt status for “only white kids”? Perhaps some will say two wrongs do not make right. Reader’s assignment, explain how tolerating one wrong makes right.

 

Entry # 298

 

It Could Be News Bulletin – Legislation sponsored by U.S. Texas Congressman Lamar Smith has resulted in first Obama Justice Department enforcement actions based on Smith’s recently sponsored legislation.

 

Two stolen cattle found on South Texas ranch near San Antonio, Texas along with over 2000 head of legally purchased cattle were all seized, rancher his family and employees jailed with out bond, and ranch seized under asset forfeiture provisions of Congressman Lamar Smith’s federal legislation called Stop Cattle Rustling Act (SCRA).

 

Smith reportedly said: Bureaucratic fascism is a wonderful thing. Computer nerds may have temporarily stopped my SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act); guess America’s stupid wimpy rancher boys were not as smart or brave as computer geeks.

Another Texas Drifter “It Could be News Bulletin”; moving on to theme of this writing exercise.

 

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Green policies which deprive property owners of their land may disrupt and threaten domestic tranquility. However Green policies with indirectly provide aid and comfort to America’s foreign enemies by tampering with America’s National Defense needed carbon based supplies is negligent treason at best and pre-meditated treason if policies are result of America last Marxist-fascist ideology, or greed based unethical capitalism.

 

Some possible solutions to Green treason policies threats:

 

1. The REINS Act: Google-geoffdavis.house.gov/REINS/about.htm
“All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” – U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 1.

-Excessive delegation of Congress’ constitutional responsibility for making the law of the land to the Executive Branch has created a lack of accountability in Congress for many of the most burdensome federal regulations.
-Although this trend is not new, allowing major decisions to be made by unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats is not consistent with the constitutional responsibilities of our representative government.
-To restore Congressional accountability for the regulatory process, Congressman Geoff Davis [KY-04] introduced the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act. The REINS Act would require Congress to take an up-or-down, stand-alone vote, and for the President to sign-off on all new major rules before they can be enforced on the American people, job-creating small businesses, or State and local governments.
-Major rules are those that have an annual economic impact of $100 million or more. Last year, 100 major rules were finalized by the Executive Branch.
-A recent study commissioned by the Small Business Administration found that annual regulatory compliance costs in the United States hit $1.75 trillion in 2008. A staggering figure that exceeds the total collected from income taxes that year ($1.449 trillion).

Idea for reader, research then consider supporting The REINS Act, Why, Obama’s and RINOS are using and will continue to use EPA’s and Interior Departments’ green policies to weaken America’s Armed Forces.

 

2. Abolish EPA and most Interior Department regulatory divisions with zero line budgeting; followed by reverse line budgeting.

 

3. Implement private sector not tax payer funding for Green venture capital projects. Future citizens will find out that one of America’s largest public sector scams were not Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; America’s largest public sector scams were tax payer dollars used as venture capital for projects involving solar power and wind power.

 

4. Develop America’s carbon energy related products using private market place not public sector short stroke ideas are viable.

 

5. Publicly denounce Green fools and their sometimes treasonous policies. One good example, Obama’s national defense policies are guided and impacted by EPA, Interior Department, and other America last Green policies.

 

Reducing the national budget for America’s Armed Forces, totally ignores the fact that specialized assault forces can influence, but can not necessarily hold “”taken” territory which requires boots on the ground. Doubt accuracy of this observation, abolish all law enforcement agencies and cops, and let few SWAT teams manage America’s domestic tranquility problems.

 

Second foolish concept requires limiting America’s military resources to a one front war army. Most wars have at least two fronts front and rear. A concept that Napoleon’s greatness apparently ignored. Following excerpt is from Texas Drifter’s own class “Spy As A Verb”: Napoleon’s version of hit and run requires decimating the first target. And striking the second target with dazzling speed and methodical ferocity. Napoleon’s divide and conquer strategies, as brilliant as they were, depended on insuring that the first target attacked did not recover and reappear on home team’s flank. Not “finishing off” the first target attacked; creates unnecessary threats that have to be dealt with later. Marshall’s social power formula can help determine the first target.

 

Continuing, Perhaps a more cost effective counter-intelligence strategy includes using pro active activities to create mistrust and hatred between enemy allies. Letting the enemy sides fight it out, makes it easier for the home team to manage or destroy a weaker “winning” enemy ally. Even use of this strategy requires military forces capable of fighting simultaneous two front wars at minimum.

 

Texas Drifter is tired of this writing exercise and closes with reader’s assignment: two true or false questions.
1. Historical evolution of societal energy technologies include: wood; coal; carbon by-products; nuclear; green technology –solar and wind; lead during anarchy.
2. America’s domestic and foreign threats include: Green activists and their public sector bureaucratic allies; illegal immigrants; Islamic Fascists terrorists; China; Russia, Venezuela, and other countries like Mexico which are not America’s allies.

 

In closing with a concept borrowed by a long gone author: treasonous actions by any other name are still treason regardless of motive: love, revenge, greed, ideology, stupidity, and even good intentions.

 

Entry # 297

Entry # 296

 

Entry # 295

Question was indirectly raised in previous All Right Magazine article “Changing Doctors In Mid-Stream?” - …Should Nurnberg type trials be held, and civil liability claims be filed against Social Security Administration workers and administrators who delay or are delaying “entitled” benefits to allow applicants time to die to reduce Social Security expenditures? Translation, premature greed contributing to premature death is a capital offense which demands due process justice in most civilized societies.

Roots and definition of word citizencide:
1. citizen – a native or naturalized, not illegal immigrant, who owes allegiance to a government and is entitled to reciprocal protection from that government
2. cide – kill not in self defense or murder
3. citizencide – government which murders its own citizens

Sometimes it is better to let reader determine their own conclusions; as they are more likely to remember their own conclusions, than answer or answers provided by another person. Answering the following questions should provide reader with starting clues to their own conclusions.

First determine following: number/percentage of applications denied and then number/percentage of applications denied reversed on appeal compared to number of deaths before, during, and soon after application and appeals processes for Social Security disability claims.

Second determine if “serial citizencide” described as systematic murders by civil servants of citizen clients by denying or delaying Social Security disability claims exists in America under Obama and Moderate Republicans Presidential Administrations.

Initial target audience for first two questions, Anglo American citizens fifty years and older. Reader might be able to decide if enough “probable cause” exists to pursue both criminal and civil charges against involved Obama and Moderate Republican officials and public bureaucrats if policies were used to deny and or delay Social Security health care services or benefits entitled by due process law to citizens clients.

Reader’s assignment includes explaining differences between above citizencide policies and more obviously brutal genocide by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and any other Satan possessed dictators.

Perhaps another definition should be included in reader’s thoughts, “bureaucide”; just asking not encouraging, recommending, advocating or any other pro-active verb.

How about one last new concept for reader to include in future conversations, bureaucratic fascism – a term that applies equally to Marxist-fascist Obama like “liberal big government advocates” and their allies, “conservative big government advocates” better known as unethical capitalist Moderate Republicans like U.S. Texas Representative "censor the internet with SOPA" supporter Lamar Smith.

 

Entry # 294

 

Entry# 293

  

Entry # 292

 

 

Entry # 291

 

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Question why would reader want to consider changing doctors in middle of health care process? Disclaimer, Texas Drifter is not a medical doctor or attorney, following writing exercise just present ideas to consider.

 

Answer includes several possibilities:
1. Perhaps reader feels doctor has prematurely “given up” on patient and is willing to “let life take its course” and let patient die. Brutal reality, occasionally few doctors would rather let their patients die than accept outside advice which might illustrate primary care physicians in competencies.
2. Perhaps reader feels doctor is acting like doctor knows more than God or has bed side manner of a feral hog; as doctor will not discuss patient’s condition or health care options with any “unwashed” patient or member of their family.
3. Perhaps doctor is practicing beyond their area of expertise or area of specialization.
4. Perhaps doctor is acting incompetently due to insufficient training, work experiences, tired or having a bad day, or other personal distractions.
5. Perhaps doctor is motivated by racist or minority ethnic hatred towards certain individuals.
6. Perhaps doctor is motivated by “short cuts” greed.
7. Reader can add to list of other possible reasons doctor may not be providing best professional services.

 

Reader’s few possible solutions to above doctor inadequacies.
1. Contact other doctors, nurses, medical-professionals like case managers from preferably other medical centers for independent second, third, or more health care opinions.
2. Reader might want to contact medical professionals from other medical facilities or institutions. Example, doctor works at ABC Hospital and is on board of directors or has friends on board of ABC Hospital. Reader might wish to contact medical professionals from a different hospital than ABC. Reader might even choose to contact medical professionals in different geographic region as doctors at ABC Hospital might have golfing buddies with doctors geographically close to ABC Hospital.
3. Reader might also contact their insurance carrier if such a decision seems appropriate. Though primary objectives might include having patient immediately transferred to another medical facility in life threatening circumstances; objectives which might be objected too by ABC Hospital which might require reader obtaining legal services. Why ABC Hospital might prefer patient not be moved to cover up ABC’s medical negligence. Preceding event can happen more than reader suspects. Reference Google: All Right Magazine Indigent Health Care Skeletons.
4. If reader does not have finances for obtaining other opinions; reader can always ask doctor as last resort: Is that what you are going to wear on six o’clock news? Doctor with all respect, if you do not professionally answer all my questions in words I can understand; I will call every member of news media and tell them you are trying to kill my loved one and will not tell me why.

 

Reader may think and many doctors will no doubt concur that some of above observations seem unfairly harsh. Reader need ask only one question: is doctor working for you or are you working for the doctor? Not improper question about highly trained well paid professionals sometime stressed medical professionals who cannot re-establish any life their negligence ends. Regardless of what anyone says, even though doctors are human beings in stress filled careers they are not comparable to witch doctors in past times or God in contemporary times.

 

Texas Drifter note about in progress writing exercise: Should Nurnberg type trials be held, and civil liability claims be filed against Social Security Administration workers and administrators who delay or are delaying “entitled” benefits to allow applicants time to die to reduce Social Security expenditures? Translation, premature greed contributing to premature death is a capital offense which demands due process justice in most civilized societies.

 

Reader’s assignment, first estimate how many Social Security genocide victims have been bureaucratically murdered to reduce benefit costs to increase public sector wages and benefits? Readers’ second assignment: List things you plan to ask your loved ones health care providers next time your loved ones need health care providers.

 

 

Entry # 290

 

 

Entry # 289

 

Entry # 288

 

Marshall’s Law Dateline – If Obama gets re-elected with help from Robespierre Republicans like Beck and Coulter to just identify two? American Judeo-Christians will have no constitutional republic to celebrate their First Amendment personal free will religious beliefs.

Robespierre Wikipedia brief reference: Maximilien François Marie Isidore de Robespierre (6 May 1758 – 28 July 1794) is one of the best-known and most influential figures of the French Revolution. He largely dominated the Committee of Public Safety and was instrumental in the period of the Revolution commonly known as the Reign of Terror, which ended with his arrest and execution in 1794. Robespierre was influenced by 18th-century Enlightenment philosophes such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Montesquieu, and he was a capable articulator of the beliefs of the left-wing bourgeoisie. His supporters called him "The Incorruptible", while his adversaries called him dictateur sanguinaire (bloodthirsty dictator).

Texas Drifter does not generally endorse specific Judeo-Christian faiths or conservative electoral candidates as both are personal conscience decisions. Citizens need to be reminded Heaven’s Son is not running for President, Reagan is deceased, and most people riding white horses down main street are usually escorted out of town.

Why would vanity driven pretender conservatives help Obama be re-elected? Maybe these conservative pretenders prefer stoning “unwashed” conservative politicians to removing Obama as the Marxist-fascist destroyer of Heaven’s favorite republic he most certainly is. Simple question, would theses same self appointed holier than thou pretender conservatives have condemned Heaven’s favorite Son for offering salvation to a tax collector?

Reader needs to remember that Judgment Day is personal; as one is judged by what they do, not by what family, friends, neighbors, or compatriots do. The Ten Commandments are not a living document allowing for interpretations or convenient changes. Example the command is honor thy father and mother, it does not say honor thy father and mother as long as doing so does not interfere with one’s pop culture life style.

One might claim that the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights are living documents solely as long that they also accept that Constitution can only be changed with Constitutional Amendments not by independent action or combined actions by any or all three branches of government, especially federal judges.

One cannot make the claim that the “oath” to Heaven to uphold protect and defend Constitution and Bill of Rights is a living document, as it as currently administered does not include exemptions or expiration date.

Comments by one who would know better than any living American, George Washington
“…containing within itself (U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights) a provision for its own amendment has a just claim to your confidence and support. Respect for its authority … The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and alter their constitutions of government. But till the constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an authentic act of the whole people, is sacred obligatory upon all.” An ethical obligation ignored by activist judges, and most elected Marxist-fascist Democrats.

More silent words by another dead patriot, James Russell Lowell in 1888, “If the politicians must look after the parties, there should be someone to look after the politicians; someone to ask disagreeable questions and utter uncomfortable truths; somebody to make sure before election, not only what but whom the candidate if elected is going to represent.” An ethical obligation ignored by citizens who voted for Obama and other Marxist-fascist Democrats along with RINOs, Moderate Republicans, and Robespierre Republicans.

This writing exercise is not about asking you to serve at Valley Forge during the winter. You are not being asked to step up to Travis’s line behind walls of the Alamo. You are not being asked to expend a great deal of energy; as even citizens on death beds have spoken up about what is best for America. All this writing exercise is about is reminding you that citizens have fought suffered and died for over two hundred years to leave you your right of free speech.

Free speech basics are: 1) start with being yourself; 2) speak about what you know and believe; 3) write like you speak about personal experiences and beliefs; 4) let family, friends, and history be your earthly judge; consider reasonable suggestions, but ignore name calling and insults; as attack insults suggest that your views have merits that cannot be judged by truth or logic. Still, you never avoid not calling tyrants evil names if they deserve the insults. Just as “a rose by any other name is still a rose”; an evil tyrant by any other name is still an evil tyrant.

Final suggestion, when the choice arrives and it always does, do what is best for America or walk away. Consider basing your decision on not what family members, friends, neighbors, or compatriots will think; make your choice based on the personal legacy you want to take with you to Judgment Day. Never forget, you might fool family, friends, neighbors, compatriots, and even enemies. Rest assured you will never fool your final Judge which is why judgment day is personal.

Closing thought, recall Texas Revolution’s Col. Travis and Col Bowie of Alamo fame truly despised each other; but agreed to postpone their duel to death until Texas had won its War for Independence.

Reader’s assignments, of what value are Robespierre Republicans who publicly cannibalize conservative Republicans for offending Robespierre Republican vanities and or ambitions?

 

Of what value are Robespierre Republicans if they readily abandon Republican Party Primary majority rule decisions like those selecting a conservative candidate for President; rest of reader’s assignment list at least twenty Robespierre Republicans. List might include: Romney, Beck, Coulter, G. Will, and M. Bachmann.

Entry # 287

 

Entry # 286

 

Marshall’s Law Dateline – America’s anti-Judeo-Christian Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrats will try; but should not be allowed to prevent teaching history of America’s traditions, values, and cultural principles on public property.

Supporting example includes following: bitter world owes me hate filled America last activists, judges, and bureaucrats denying Christmas mangers on public property.

Another example, public school children prohibited from performing Christmas songs, plays, and other activities as historical lessons on public property. Factual distinction for all those bitter, “world owes us”, many racists, hate filled, America last activists, judges, and bureaucrats: teaching history of America’s traditions, values, and principles is totally different activity than trying to respect an establishment of religion. (Good reference source for this writing exercise is Google: All Right Magazine Texas Drifter America’s First Tradition.)

As far as all those mean spirited bad evil bitter people trying to prevent teaching history of America’s traditions, values, and cultural principles; Texas Drifter might offer following declaration: Scrooge you, you unpatriotic embarrassments to all those grateful for Heaven’s blessings by being Americans. Some might think Texas Drifter’s declaration is might strong; wonder if Heaven’s Son used politically correct language as he cast out the moneylenders from the temple?

Two assignments for reader: first is following true or false? Teaching Christmas history on public property is not trying to respect establishment of religion; while denying teaching of Christmas as history on public property is trying to respect establishment of a religion with government as God.

Second part of reader’s assignment: consider ways to use following “History Of Christmas Manger” to remind those grateful for Heaven’s blessings due to America’s cultural history.

Title: History Of Christmas Manger

Texas Drifter note: Time to say it again. May God bless Conservatives with a safe, happy, joyful, holiday season with spiritual blessings during their upcoming birthday celebration; time to read a loud a play entitled “History Of Christmas Manger”

Players:
- Simon
- Anna, a Prophetess
- Quirinius, Governor of Syria
- Census Taker
- Simon’s Helper
- Two Visitors

Introduction

 

(Simon praying in a temple)
Simon: Oh, Heavenly Father, forgive my selfishness. You have blessed me with the privilege of owning the finest olive gardens, the finest sheep herds, the finest inn, and the most profitable market in all of Judea. Yet my rapacious soul would trade all these earthly blessings for the honor of gazing upon your son the Messiah.
(Suddenly the still wind chimes introduce a saintly intruder)

Anna: You will not die until you have seen God’s anointed King.

Act I

(Quirinius on a small throne in his temple with figure kneeling before him)
Quirinius: Rise, my fool of a son (person rises). Caesar Augustus has ordered a census to be taken across the empire to make the collection of taxes more efficient. I am commanding you to carry out Caesar’s orders in Judea. If you can accomplish this task I shall reward your efforts by making you tax collector for Judea.

New Census Taker: I wish to thank you.

Quirinius (interrupts): I have no time for fool’s babble. Who is the most influential merchant in Judea?

Census Taker: Simon of Jerusalem. He has the finest olive gardens, the largest sheep herds, the finest inn, and the most profitable market.

Quirinius: I have heard of Simon. Tell me more.

Census Taker: Simon is a devout man who refuses to engage in money lending or take an interest in politics.

Quirinius: Destroy this Simon of Jerusalem.

Census Taker: Why? He is an honest merchant without enemies.

Quirinius: It is not Simon that could be a threat but the thieves who may use his wealth against us. Be gone, I have grown tired of you.

Act II

(Six months later – Quirinius on a small throne in his temple with Census Taker kneeling before him)
Quirinius: Rise, my fool of a son: Report to me about your progress on the census and Simon of Jerusalem.

Census Taker: The census taking process is on schedule. As for Simon of Jerusalem: I released locusts into his olive gardens. I destroyed his sheep herds with plagues. I burned his inn. I had bandits steal his wealth, and I have incited riots at his market so none will shop there. I am ready to return as tax collector.

Quirinius (erupts in to rage): You fool, you have signed both our death warrants. I ordered you to destroy Simon, not his property. How can taxes be paid to Caesar with barren trees, dead sheep, ashes, empty coffers, or empty market places? Guards, let it be known that my fool son’s inheritance shall be sent to Caesar to reimburse Simon’s losses resulting from my fool son’s actions. Let it also be known that my son shall be banished from Syria for the remainder of my life.

Act III

(Simon and Simon’s Helper standing by three-sided shelter)
Simon (pointing): Isn’t it beautiful?

Simon’s Helper: Sir, how can a man who never cheated or punished the innocent, a man who has lost everything he earned his entire life, see beauty in THIS? Sir, every night, I shed tears of confusion not knowing why Heaven is punishing you.

Simon: My dearest lifelong friend, I see beauty in THIS because I see opportunity. As for heaven punishing me, stewards of faith know the difference between punishment and preparation.

Simon’s Helper: Where’s the opportunity in having a stable without a bucket to bring water, or straw for feed?

Visitor (enters stage): I am looking for Simon of Jerusalem.

Simon: I am Simon of Jerusalem.

Visitor: Many decades ago before I was born, you loaned my father this bucket. His dying words were that I return your bucket with five donkeys loaded with straw.

Simon: I grieve for the loss of an honest man. I greatly accept the return of my bucket. Heaven only asks for tithes of ten percent; it would be a sin for me to accept straw from your donkeys. Now I must go to the temple to pray for your loss.
(Turning to helper) Use the bucket to bring us water.

Conclusion: (Simon returns to stable to find stable half full of animals and Simon’s Helper talking to another visitor)

Simon’s Helper: Great news, a few more customers and you shall have enough profits to buy new sheep.

Simon: I thought I said I could not accept straw from the visitor.

Simon’s Helper: The visitor insisted that the straw from five donkeys was a gift, not interest for a debt.

Simon: Who is there now?

Simon’s Helper: Some man less fortunate than us. The man cannot afford shelter for his wife who is about to give birth.

Simon: What were you telling this man who is less fortunate than us?

Simon’s Helper: I was telling him that Heaven was preparing him, not punishing him.

Simon (interrupts): And?

Simon’s Helper: I shall tell Joseph that it would be an honor for you to share your stable; with him, his wife, and their soon to be born child.

Simon: I must return to the Temple to seek Anna’s guidance.
(At the Temple)

Anna (to Simon): Eight days later during Mary’s purification offering at this Temple, you will speak, “Lord now I can die content for I have seen him as you promised.”

(Pause – Simon and Anna freeze as Simon’s Helper walks on stage)

Simon’s Helper: Anna’s prophecy came true, and Simon found peace as a contented man. Simon later restored that which had been lost to the would- be tax collector. I might add that his restoration work was made much easier by my loyalty. Let me tell you about my tireless efforts.

(Cast and all those involved in play break in while walking on stage singing – reader’s favorite Christmas song.

 

Entry # 285

 
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Marshall’s Law Dateline – “Every Third Monday” interview for Monday November 21, 2011 outline ideas for Mr. Dave with KGAB AM 650 Cheyenne, Wyoming will air on Monday November 21, 2011 at 9 AM Central; Listen at KGAB.com. Mr. Dave shorter list than usual should provide plenty South Texas Border subject matter

 

Not New News Items

1. First Official Cross Border Violence Incident … what not considered border spill over violence …
2. Cartels This Side Of Border: homes, real estate, business investments – might check out Obama’s recent Mexican trucking across America …
3. Cartel soldiers evolving into insurgents - 5K to $300. recruiting …
4. Reference following All Right Magazine articles with illustrations for general questions: Google All Right Magazine
- Children’s Basic Porous Border Math
- Obama, Illegals, And Chagas Disease
- America’s Gaza Strip?
- Assimilation, The Big Lie
5. Latest Not News
6. Caller’s Comments Questions