Marshall’s Law Dateline – Are Presidential candidate Obama and presumptive candidate Romney both accessories to genocide against American citizens and American “legal residents”?
Starting at the beginning, definition of genocide is “deliberate and systematic destruction of specific culture, political group, or race.” How many individuals have to be injured or destroyed to be considered victims of genocide?
Consider the following: Numbers detailing crimes by illegal immigrants can be vague as most government bureaucrats do not wish to embarrass illegal immigrants by keeping accurate crime statistics on a segment of America’s population that represents ten percent of the population and commits by good estimates thirty to forty percent of violent and property crimes in America.
Doubt this observation, in 2010 there were an estimated 1,246,248 violent crimes and also in 2010 an estimated 9,082,887 property crimes committed in America. Using a ten year old out of date factor twenty five, results still suggest that illegal immigrants committed estimated three hundred eleven thousand plus violent crimes per year, and estimated two million plus property crimes against Americans in one year - 2010. Using a more current multiple factor would no doubt increase those numbers.
Using best above guesstimate estimate numbers for past three years, illegal immigrants have committed violent crimes against more than a million citizens and legal Americans, and more than six million property crimes against same group. Since group targeted by illegal immigrants includes all “legal Americans” are these groups’ casualty numbers large enough to be considered genocide?
As the answer most definitely seems yes, who can be considered accessories to this genocide against legal Americans? Both Obama and Romney by their actions not their words; both support porous borders which enables illegal immigrants to enter America; both support some type of amnesty not called amnesty which entices more illegal immigrants to illegally enter America; both oppose combination of voluntary and involuntary deportation of illegal immigrants; and both support letting illegal immigrants “cut in line” in front of immigrants “jumping through hoops” at great financial expenses to become legal residents and naturalized citizens.
Why would Obama and his Marxist-fascist allies and Romney and his Republican establishment aristocratic friends engage is such un-American due process behaviors?
Simple, Obama wants votes from illegal immigrants to hold on to his political power; while Romney wants want to make cheap labor available to his allies plus serve interests of Mexican aristocrats by allowing illegal immigrants into America which serves as relief valve and keeps Mexico’s corrupt aristocrats in power.
Reader’s assignment, present verbally or in writing why both Obama’s and Romney should not be considered presidential candidates whose actions are facilitating violent and property crimes against millions of Americans, and does not fit definition of accessories to genocide.
Translation, explain why it would be preferable to have one’s family destroyed by Obama’s accessory actions; as opposed to being more preferable to have one’s family destroyed by Romney’s accessory actions? Seems like a good topic for some Sunday morning roundtable talk show.
As for Texas Drifter, I am going to have to say pox on both those choices. Texas Drifter does not feel genocide or being accessory to genocide of any kind against any American is any kind of tolerable idea.